VARIABLES AFFECTING EXCAVATION SHRINKAGE FACTORS Mark J. Farrow, P.E.Development of large sites require civil engineering studies to determine appropriate finished floor elevations and final grade elevations that will result in a balanced cut/fill condition. During these studies, estimates must be made to approximate the shrinkage factor that may be anticipated during excavation and compaction operations. If appropriate shrinkage factors are not used, major changes in grading plans and finished floor elevations are required during construction activities. These changes can result in significant additional change order costs to the owner or developer. Increased development costs can be fairly large if adequate quantities of fill soil are not available to achieve the final pad elevations specified. Problems also tend to escalate if the fill shortage is not detected during the early stages of grading operations. In order to prevent the need for major grading changes during construction, variables affecting shrinkage factors must be identified and considered. Due to repeated problems with large unbalanced cut/fill quantities at large residential sites across the DFW Metroplex, studies were performed to determine a procedure and design methodology related to the estimation of shrinkage factors used during earthwork operations. This paper presents variables other than compaction levels and in-situ soil densities that can affect the accuracy of balanced cut/fill studies. It also presents a method of calculating the anticipated shrinkage or swell factor based on simple geotechnical parameters.
Please see the abstracts below. Please contact Mr. Farrow for more information.
1. Factors Affecting Expansive Soil PVR Variations 2. Philosophical Approach to Design of Residential Foundations on Expansive Clay Soils 3. Variables Affecting Excavation Shrinkage Factors 4. Pavement Design Standards for the 21st Century 5. Reduced Excavation Costs Through Q.C. Measures 6. Expansive Soils PVR Theories vs. Case Histories 7. Slab-On-Grade Foundations: State of Art / Confusion? 8. Field CBR Determinations by Laboratory Method 9. Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Tunneling Operations Cole Park Detention Vault, Dallas, Texas 10. Hydrostatic Wave Modeling, Texas Ranger Amphitheater 11. In-Depth Characterization of the Eagle Ford Shale 12. Injection Stabilization, DFW Airport Pavement and Roadway Widening Within DFW Metroplex 13. Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Tunneling/Excavation Operations, Dart Light Rail Transit System, Dallas, Texas 14. Shallow Foundations on Expansive Soil at Grapevine Mills Mall, Grapevine, Texas 15. Superior Pavement Subbase for the 21st Century 16. Soil Nail Retaining Walls above Steep Sloped Embankments 17. Factors That Cause MSE Wall Creep That are not Identified During Global Stability Studies 18. Factors Causing Ground Shrinkage from Tree Roots Well Beyond Drip Lines 19. Performance of Double Liming Eagle Ford Shaley Clay Having High Soluble Sulfates Levels 20. Deep Seated Swell in the Eagle Ford Shale Caused by Water Line Leakage |